[Python-Dev] PEP 8 recommends short module names because FAT is still common today (original) (raw)
Ben Finney ben+python at benfinney.id.au
Tue Oct 20 23:54:07 EDT 2015
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 8 recommends short module names because FAT is still common today (was: PEP-8 wart... it recommends short names because of DOS)
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP-8 wart... it recommends short names because of DOS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> writes:
[…] I've removed the offending paragraph from the PEP. Note that it still recommends short, all-lowercase module and package names -- it just doesn't use computers to motivate it.
That suits me too. I think the justification was valid, but its absence doesn't harm the PEP.
-- \ “I busted a mirror and got seven years bad luck, but my lawyer | `\ thinks he can get me five.” —Steven Wright | o_) | Ben Finney
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 8 recommends short module names because FAT is still common today (was: PEP-8 wart... it recommends short names because of DOS)
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP-8 wart... it recommends short names because of DOS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]