[Python-Dev] Should PEP 498 specify if rf'...' is valid? (original) (raw)
Ryan Gonzalez rymg19 at gmail.com
Thu Oct 22 12:17:25 EDT 2015
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Should PEP 498 specify if rf'...' is valid?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Should PEP 498 specify if rf'...' is valid?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On October 22, 2015 11:10:48 AM CDT, "Sven R. Kunze" <srkunze at mail.de> wrote:
On 22.10.2015 13:32, Eric V. Smith wrote:
['B', 'BF', 'BFR', 'BFr', 'BR', 'BRF', 'BRf', 'Bf', 'BfR', 'Bfr', 'Br', 'BrF', 'Brf', 'F', 'FB', 'FBR', 'FBr', 'FR', 'FRB', 'FRb', 'Fb', 'FbR', 'Fbr', 'Fr', 'FrB', 'Frb', 'R', 'RB', 'RBF', 'RBf', 'RF', 'RFB', 'RFb', 'Rb', 'RbF', 'Rbf', 'Rf', 'RfB', 'Rfb', 'U', 'b', 'bF', 'bFR', 'bFr', 'bR', 'bRF', 'bRf', 'bf', 'bfR', 'bfr', 'br', 'brF', 'brf', 'f', 'fB', 'fBR', 'fBr', 'fR', 'fRB', 'fRb', 'fb', 'fbR', 'fbr', 'fr', 'frB', 'frb', 'r', 'rB', 'rBF', 'rBf', 'rF', 'rFB', 'rFb', 'rb', 'rbF', 'rbf', 'rf', 'rfB', 'rfb', 'u']
I think the upper/lower ones are nuts, but it's probably too late to do anything about it. 'FbR', really? Why not disallowing them? I for one could live with all-lower-case AND a predefined order.
Well, now it's backwards-compatibility.
Best, Sven
Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev at python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/rymg19%40gmail.com
-- Sent from my Nexus 5 with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Should PEP 498 specify if rf'...' is valid?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Should PEP 498 specify if rf'...' is valid?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]