[Python-Dev] Should PEP 498 specify if rf'...' is valid? (original) (raw)
Eric V. Smith eric at trueblade.com
Thu Oct 22 13:12:48 EDT 2015
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Should PEP 498 specify if rf'...' is valid?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Should PEP 498 specify if rf'...' is valid?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 10/22/2015 1:09 PM, Ryan Gonzalez wrote:
But it'd be weird now if fR worked but fbR didn't.
Or bR (which is currently allowed) but not fbR in the future.
Eric.
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Sven R. Kunze <srkunze at mail.de_ _<mailto:srkunze at mail.de>> wrote: On 22.10.2015 18:17, Ryan Gonzalez wrote:
anything about it. 'FbR', really? Why not disallowing them? I for one could live with all-lower-case AND a predefined order. Well, now it's backwards-compatibility. Huh? There are no fb strings yet. Best, Sven
-- Ryan [ERROR]: Your autotools build scripts are 200 lines longer than your program. Something’s wrong. http://kirbyfan64.github.io/
Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev at python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/eric%2Ba-python-dev%40trueblade.com
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Should PEP 498 specify if rf'...' is valid?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Should PEP 498 specify if rf'...' is valid?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]