[Python-Dev] Should PEP 498 specify if rf'...' is valid? (original) (raw)
Sven R. Kunze srkunze at mail.de
Thu Oct 22 13🔞41 EDT 2015
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Should PEP 498 specify if rf'...' is valid?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Generated Bytecode ...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Yeah, that would be weird.
Really? That's ridiculous. We don't allow DEF or DeF for function definitions either. So, I don't see any value in it.
IMHO, It's time for a clean up again.
On 22.10.2015 19:09, Ryan Gonzalez wrote:
But it'd be weird now if fR worked but fbR didn't.
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Sven R. Kunze <srkunze at mail.de_ _<mailto:srkunze at mail.de>> wrote: On 22.10.2015 18:17, Ryan Gonzalez wrote:
anything about it. 'FbR', really? Why not disallowing them? I for one could live with all-lower-case AND a predefined order. Well, now it's backwards-compatibility. Huh? There are no fb strings yet.
Best, Sven -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20151022/9dd4b69d/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Should PEP 498 specify if rf'...' is valid?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Generated Bytecode ...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]