[Python-Dev] Should PEP 498 specify if rf'...' is valid? (original) (raw)
Mark Lawrence breamoreboy at yahoo.co.uk
Tue Oct 27 16:39:33 EDT 2015
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Should PEP 498 specify if rf'...' is valid?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Should PEP 498 specify if rf'...' is valid?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 27/10/2015 18:39, Sven R. Kunze wrote:
On 26.10.2015 20:54, Ethan Furman wrote:
You misunderstand -- the order of string prefixes does not matter, so forcing us to use one is silly. I don't think so. It's better to have less possibilities in the beginning. So later on, we can easily relax the restrictions without breaking compatibility. Best, Sven
Please no. Having a memory much like a bottomless sieve I have no intention of reading the manual every time I need to use string prefixes. Would the table listing "string prefix precedence" in The Fine Docs™ be unique in the programming world?
-- My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask what you can do for our language.
Mark Lawrence
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Should PEP 498 specify if rf'...' is valid?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Should PEP 498 specify if rf'...' is valid?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]