[Python-Dev] PEP 498: Literal String Interpolation is ready for pronouncement (original) (raw)
Victor Stinner victor.stinner at gmail.com
Sat Sep 5 23:22:38 CEST 2015
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 498: Literal String Interpolation is ready for pronouncement
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 498: Literal String Interpolation is ready for pronouncement
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
If you really want to allow any Python inside a f-string, can you
please at least explain in the PEP why you consider that it's a good thing?
Sigh. We've gone over this on python-ideas. Your objection is not new.
I'm sure that later others will have exactly the same question than me. Is''t the purpose of the PEP to summarize a discussion to not have to repeat it again and again?
Please, can anyone summerize the discussion (on allowing or not complex expressions in f-string) into a short paragraph in the PEP?
I don't follow python-ideas and I don't want to subscribe.
Victor -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150905/2d4b2816/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 498: Literal String Interpolation is ready for pronouncement
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 498: Literal String Interpolation is ready for pronouncement
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]