[Python-Dev] Choosing an official stance towards module deprecation in Python 3 (original) (raw)
Donald Stufft donald at stufft.io
Tue Sep 8 19:35:44 CEST 2015
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Choosing an official stance towards module deprecation in Python 3
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Choosing an official stance towards module deprecation in Python 3
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On September 8, 2015 at 1:29:58 PM, Brett Cannon (bcannon at gmail.com) wrote:
That is one possibility, but I notice that django.contrib.comments is still getting updated. For deprecated modules they probably won't even get bugfixes anymore so I wouldn't want to give the wrong impression the modules are still being maintained. Plus we would have to figure out who is in charge of the actual project on PyPI since there isn't a concept of group ownership.
I don't really much care which way it is done, I was just throwing it out there as a possibility. Though I think the first problem is solvable by clear documentation. Actually in Django's case I think it was "Ok we've removed it, if somebody wants to step up and maintain it they can, otherwise it's going to wither and die on it's own", but my memory might be faulty. The second problem is easier, you can add multiple people to a project, and "Organization/Group" accounts will be something that gets implemented in Warehouse.
Donald Stufft PGP: 0x6E3CBCE93372DCFA // 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Choosing an official stance towards module deprecation in Python 3
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Choosing an official stance towards module deprecation in Python 3
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]