[Python-Dev] PEP 495 Was: PEP 498: Literal String Interpolation is ready for pronouncement (original) (raw)
Alexander Belopolsky alexander.belopolsky at gmail.com
Sat Sep 12 05:17:00 CEST 2015
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 495 Was: PEP 498: Literal String Interpolation is ready for pronouncement
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 495 Was: PEP 498: Literal String Interpolation is ready for pronouncement
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 11:07 PM, MRAB <python at mrabarnett.plus.com> wrote:
What would happen if it's decided to stay on DST and then, later on, to reintroduce DST?
No problem as long as you don't move the clock back x minutes and then decide that you did not move it back enough and move it again before x minutes have passed. Fortunately, no government in the world can pass a new law in an hour. More so in an hour between 01:00 and 02:00 AM. :-)
An interesting possibility is a fold straddling a leap second, but hopefully those who pass the timekeeping laws have learned about the leap seconds by now. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150911/1e462414/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 495 Was: PEP 498: Literal String Interpolation is ready for pronouncement
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 495 Was: PEP 498: Literal String Interpolation is ready for pronouncement
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]