[Python-Dev] Defining a path protocol (original) (raw)

Wes Turner wes.turner at gmail.com
Wed Apr 6 22:24:19 EDT 2016

On Apr 6, 2016 6:31 PM, "Brett Cannon" <brett at python.org> wrote:

On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 at 16:25 Nathaniel Smith <njs at pobox.com> wrote: On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote: > > > On Wed, 6 Apr 2016 at 15:22 Paul Moore <p.f.moore at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> So I think we need a builtin. > > > Well, the ugliness shouldn't survive forever if the community shifts over to > using pathlib while the built-in will. We also don't have a built-in for > index() so it depends on whether we expect this sort of thing to be the > purview of library authors or if normal people will be interacting with it > (it's probably both during the transition, but I don't know afterwards). For index the "built-in" is: from operator import index Which suggests perhaps we should have pathlib.fspath() instead of a built-in.

Would it make sense to instead have pathlib.Path.init?

Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev at python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/wes.turner%40gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20160406/c2e68bcf/attachment.html>

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list