[Python-Dev] Pathlib enhancements - acceptable inputs and outputs for fspath and os.fspath() (original) (raw)
Ethan Furman ethan at stoneleaf.us
Wed Apr 13 13:06:33 EDT 2016
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Pathlib enhancements - acceptable inputs and outputs for __fspath__ and os.fspath()
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Pathlib enhancements - acceptable inputs and outputs for __fspath__ and os.fspath()
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 04/13/2016 09:58 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:> On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 at 09:19 Fred Drake wrote:
I do the same, but... this is one of those cases where a caller will usually be passing a constant directly. If passed as a positional argument, it'll just be confusing ("what's True?" is my usual reaction to a Boolean positional argument).
It would be keyword-only so this isn't even a possibility.
If passed as a keyword argument with a descriptive name, it'll be longer than I'd like to see:
path_str = os.fspath(path, allow_bytes=True)
I think the expectation that the number of people actually directly calling this function with that argument specified is going to be rather small, so the common-case will simply be:
path_str = os.fspath(path)
That is certainly my expectation. :)
Names like os.fspath() and os.fssyspath() seem good to me.
A single function is definitely my preference, but if that's not possible then I'm fine with that pair of names.
--
Ethan
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Pathlib enhancements - acceptable inputs and outputs for __fspath__ and os.fspath()
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Pathlib enhancements - acceptable inputs and outputs for __fspath__ and os.fspath()
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]