[Python-Dev] [Python-ideas] pep 7 line break suggestion differs from pep 8 (original) (raw)
Chris Angelico rosuav at gmail.com
Mon Apr 18 16:27:05 EDT 2016
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Updated PEP 509
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] [Python-ideas] pep 7 line break suggestion differs from pep 8
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 5:33 AM, Joseph Jevnik <joejev at gmail.com> wrote:
I saw that there was recently a change to pep 8 to suggest adding a line break before a binary operator. Pep 7 suggests the opposite:
When you break a long expression at a binary operator, the operator goes at the end of the previous line, e.g.: if (type->tpdictoffset != 0 && base->tpdictoffset == 0 && type->tpdictoffset == bsize && (sizet)tsize == bsize + sizeof(PyObject *)) return 0; /* "Forgive" adding a dict only */ I imagine that some of the reasons for making the change in pep 8 for readability reasons will also translate to C; maybe pep 7 should also be updated.
I would agree with this. Passing it directly to python-dev as that's where the key decision makers are.
ChrisA
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Updated PEP 509
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] [Python-ideas] pep 7 line break suggestion differs from pep 8
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]