[Python-Dev] PEP 515: Underscores in Numeric Literals (original) (raw)

Georg Brandl g.brandl at gmx.net
Thu Feb 11 12:40:33 EST 2016

On 02/11/2016 06:19 PM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:

Thanks for the alternate patch. I used the two-function approach you took in ast.c for my latest revision.

I still think that some cases (like two of the examples in the PEP, 0b11110000 and 1.5j) are worth having, and therefore a more relaxed rule is preferable. Should I write an alternative PEP for strong rule?

That seems excessive for a minor point. Let's collect feedback for a few days, and we can also collect some informal votes.

In the end, I suspect that Guido will let us know about his preference for one of the possibilities, and when he does, I will update the PEP accordingly.

cheers, Georg

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list