[Python-Dev] PEP 509 (original) (raw)

Ethan Furman ethan at stoneleaf.us
Tue Jan 12 17:24:50 EST 2016

On 01/12/2016 01:34 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:

2016-01-12 19:52 GMT+01:00 Ethan Furman <ethan at stoneleaf.us>:

[1] We're not going to call it version are we? Seems like cachetoken is a much better name. See the online version to the most recent version of the PEP: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0509/ In the first version I proposed to expose the version, but I changed my mind, it's not private (only exposed in the C API).

Even if not exposed at the Python layer, it's still exposed when working at the C layer. Is version any less confusing there? (I only work in C when working on Python, and only occasionally, so my question is real.)

-- Ethan

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list