[Python-Dev] FAT Python (lack of) performance (original) (raw)
Victor Stinner victor.stinner at gmail.com
Mon Jan 25 16:43:16 EST 2016
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] FAT Python (lack of) performance
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] FAT Python (lack of) performance
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi,
2016-01-25 22:20 GMT+01:00 Ludovic Gasc <gmludo at gmail.com>:
Just thanks for this big contribution. And maybe this project could give new ideas to optimize Python, who knows ?
Sorry for my long email. I should try to summarize next time :-) In short: FAT Python is not fast today, but it will be faster if you give me a few more months to implement optimizations which will unlock the real power of AST optimizers ;-)
I have a looooong list of ideas of optimizations: https://fatoptimizer.readthedocs.org/en/latest/todo.html
According to microbenchmarks, the most promising optimizations are functions inlining (Python function calls are slow :-/) and specialize the code for the type of arguments.
And I agree to wait until fatoptimizer is proven to be faster than the regular CPython before taking a decision of my 3 PEPs (509, 510, 511).
Victor
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] FAT Python (lack of) performance
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] FAT Python (lack of) performance
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]