[Python-Dev] FAT Python (lack of) performance (original) (raw)
Victor Stinner victor.stinner at gmail.com
Mon Jan 25 17:58:12 EST 2016
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] FAT Python (lack of) performance
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] FAT Python (lack of) performance
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
2016-01-25 22:51 GMT+01:00 Sven R. Kunze <srkunze at mail.de>:
- they provide a great infrastructure for optimizing CPython AND extending/experimenting Python as an ecosystem
I hope that these API will create more optimizer projects than just fatoptimizer.
For example, I expect more specialized optimizers like numba or pythran which are very efficient but more specific (ex: numeric computations) than fatoptimizer. Maybe not new optimizers, but just glue to existing static compilers (numba, pythran, cython, etc.).
If there's anything I can do, let me know. :)
Oh, they are a lot of things to do! My patches for PEP 509, 510 and 511 still need some love (reviews):
http://bugs.python.org/issue26058 http://bugs.python.org/issue26098 http://bugs.python.org/issue26145
I'm finishing my patch adding ast.Constant. This one is less controversal, it has no impact on performance nor the Python semantics:
http://bugs.python.org/issue26146
But these patches are boring C code. You may prefer to work on the funny fatoptimizer project which is written in pure Python:
https://fatoptimizer.readthedocs.org/en/latest/
Victor
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] FAT Python (lack of) performance
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] FAT Python (lack of) performance
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]