[Python-Dev] BDFL ruling request: should we block forever waiting for high-quality random bits? (original) (raw)
Victor Stinner victor.stinner at gmail.com
Thu Jun 9 07:35:38 EDT 2016
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] BDFL ruling request: should we block forever waiting for high-quality random bits?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] BDFL ruling request: should we block forever waiting for high-quality random bits?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I understood that Christian Heimes and/or Donald Stufft are interested to work on a PEP.
2016-06-09 13:25 GMT+02:00 Larry Hastings <larry at hastings.org>:
A problem has surfaced just this week in 3.5.1. Obviously this is a good time to fix it for 3.5.2. But there's a big argument over what is "broken" and what is an appropriate "fix".
IMHO the bug is now fixed in 3.5.2 as I explained at: http://haypo-notes.readthedocs.io/pep_random.html#status-of-python-3-5-2
THE PROBLEM
Issue #26839: http://bugs.python.org/issue26839 (warning, the issue is now astonishingly long, and exhausting to read, and various bits of it are factually wrong)
You may want to read my summary: http://haypo-notes.readthedocs.io/pep_random.html
I'm not interested to reply to Larry's email point per point. IHMO a formal PEP is now required for Python 3.6 (to enhance os.urandom and clarify Python behaviour before urandom is initialized). Python 3.5.2 is fixed, there is no more urgency ;-)
Victor
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] BDFL ruling request: should we block forever waiting for high-quality random bits?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] BDFL ruling request: should we block forever waiting for high-quality random bits?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]