[Python-Dev] PEP 520: Ordered Class Definition Namespace (original) (raw)
Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
Thu Jun 9 17:39:40 EDT 2016
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 520: Ordered Class Definition Namespace
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 520: Ordered Class Definition Namespace
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 7 June 2016 at 20:17, Eric Snow <ericsnowcurrently at gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 6:20 PM, Ethan Furman <ethan at stoneleaf.us> wrote:
If definitionorder is supposed to be immutable as well as read-only then we should convert non-tuples to tuples. No point in letting that user bug slip through. Do you mean if a class explicitly defines definitionorder? If so, I'm not clear on how that would work. It could be set to anything, including None or a value that does not iterate into a definition order. If someone explicitly set definitionorder then I think it should be used as-is.
I'm guessing Ethan is suggesting defining it as:
__definition_order__ = tuple(ns["__definition_order__"])
When the attribute is present in the method body.
That restriction would be comparable to what we do with slots today:
>>> class C:
... __slots__ = 1
...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
TypeError: 'int' object is not iterable
Cheers, Nick.
-- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 520: Ordered Class Definition Namespace
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 520: Ordered Class Definition Namespace
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]