[Python-Dev] PEP 468 (original) (raw)
zreed at fastmail.com zreed at fastmail.com
Fri Jun 10 13:04:31 EDT 2016
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 468
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 468
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I would be super excited for this feature, so if there's a reasonable chance of it being picked up I don't mind doing the implementation work.
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016, at 11:54 AM, Eric Snow wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Émanuel Barry <vgr255 at live.ca> wrote: > As stated by Guido (and pointed out in the PEP): > > Making **kwds ordered is still open, but requires careful design and > implementation to avoid slowing down function calls that don't benefit. > > The PEP has not been updated in a while, though. Python 3.5 has been > released, and with it a C implementation of OrderedDict. > > Eric, are you still interested in this?
Yes, but wasn't planning on dusting it off yet (i.e. in time for 3.6). I'm certainly not opposed to someone picking up the banner. > IIRC that PEP was one of the > motivating use cases for implementing OrderedDict in C. Correct, though I'm not sure OrderedDict needs to be involved any more. > Maybe it's time for > a second round of discussion on Python-ideas? Fine with me, though I won't have a lot of time in the 3.6 timeframe to handle a high-volume discussion or push through an implementation. -eric
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 468
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 468
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]