[Python-Dev] Compact dict implementations (was: PEP 468 (original) (raw)
Franklin Lee leewangzhong+rsm at gmail.com
Sat Jun 18 12:57:16 EDT 2016
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Compact dict implementations (was: PEP 468
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Compact dict implementations (was: PEP 468
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In the original discussion, I think they decided to reimplement set before dict.
The original discussion is here, for anyone else: https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-December/123028.html
On Jun 18, 2016 3:15 AM, "INADA Naoki" <songofacandy at gmail.com> wrote:
If builtin dict in both of PyPy and CPython is ordered, many people will relying it. It will force other Python implementations to implement it for compatibility. In other words, it may be de-facto "Python Language", even if Python Language spec say it's an implementation detail.
Is it OK?
Ordered, or just initially ordered? I mean, "ordered if no deletion".
They discussed scrambling the order.
(Subdiscussion was here: https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-December/123041.html) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20160618/d860e869/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Compact dict implementations (was: PEP 468
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Compact dict implementations (was: PEP 468
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]