[Python-Dev] file system path protocol PEP (original) (raw)
Koos Zevenhoven k7hoven at gmail.com
Fri May 13 04:36:04 EDT 2016
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] file system path protocol PEP
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] file system path protocol PEP
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
This has just been discussed very recently in this thread (and earlier too). It may make sense, but it's not among our current worries. Besides, we already added the new fspath semantics to the PEP.
While I hope Brett is asleep in his time zone, I'm guessing he will agree (just saying this because you write "@Brett").
-- Koos
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Sven R. Kunze <srkunze at mail.de> wrote:
On 12.05.2016 18:24, Guido van Rossum wrote:
def fspath(p: Union[str, bytes, PathLike]) -> Union[str, bytes]: if isinstance(p, (str, bytes)): return p try: return p.fspath except AttributeError: raise TypeError(...) @Brett Would you think it makes sense to swap the str/bytes check and the fspath check? I just thought of a class subclassing str/bytes and defines fspath. Its fspath method would be ignored currently. Best, Sven
Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev at python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/k7hoven%40gmail.com
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] file system path protocol PEP
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] file system path protocol PEP
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]