[Python-Dev] Removing the provisional label from pathlib (original) (raw)

Brett Cannon brett at python.org
Fri May 20 12:43:09 EDT 2016


Three questions:

  1. Should pathlib gain fspath() all the way back to 3.4?
  2. Should pathlib's constructor support fspath() all the way back to 3.4? (separate question as os.fspath() will only be in 3.6; and if we backport I'm not looking forward to making Typeshed happy w/o os.PathLike being available only in 3.6 :/)
  3. Should the docs from 3.4 and forward reflect the removal of the provisional status? (I assume yes, but wanted to double-check)

And a quick thanks to Guido for removing path from pathlib for me already. :) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20160520/4ba9934a/attachment.html>



More information about the Python-Dev mailing list