[Python-Dev] Adding bytes.frombuffer() constructor to PEP 467 (was: [Python-ideas] Adding bytes.frombuffer() constructor (original) (raw)
Victor Stinner victor.stinner at gmail.com
Wed Oct 12 12:42:01 EDT 2016
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Adding bytes.frombuffer() constructor to PEP 467 (was: [Python-ideas] Adding bytes.frombuffer() constructor
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Adding bytes.frombuffer() constructor to PEP 467 (was: [Python-ideas] Adding bytes.frombuffer() constructor
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Oops, right, I wanted to write "I don't think that adding a single method deserves its own PEP."
Victor
2016-10-12 18:37 GMT+02:00 Stephen J. Turnbull <turnbull.stephen.fw at u.tsukuba.ac.jp>:
Victor Stinner writes: > 2016-10-12 11:34 GMT+02:00 INADA Naoki <songofacandy at gmail.com>:
> > I see. My proposal should be another PEP (if PEP is required). > > I don't think that adding a single method deserves its own method. You mean "deserves own PEP", right? I interpreted Nick to say that "the reasons that applied to PEP 367 don't apply here, so you can Just Do It" (subject to the usual criteria for review, but omit the PEP). I'm not sure whether he was channeling Guido or that should be qualified with an IMO or IMHO.
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Adding bytes.frombuffer() constructor to PEP 467 (was: [Python-ideas] Adding bytes.frombuffer() constructor
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Adding bytes.frombuffer() constructor to PEP 467 (was: [Python-ideas] Adding bytes.frombuffer() constructor
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]