[Python-Dev] PEP 467: last round (?) (original) (raw)
Ethan Furman ethan at stoneleaf.us
Fri Sep 2 19:44:08 EDT 2016
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 467: last round (?)
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 467: last round (?)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 09/01/2016 04:07 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:
2016-09-02 0:04 GMT+02:00 Ethan Furman:
-
fromord
to replace the mistaken purpose of the default constructor To replace a bogus bytes(obj)? If someone writes bytes(obj) but expect to create a byte string from an integer, why not using bchr() to fix the code?
The problem with only having bchr
is that it doesn't help with bytearray
; the problem with not having bchr
is who wants to write bytes.fromord
?
So we need bchr
, and we need bytearray.fromord
; and since the major difference between bytes
and bytearray
is that one is mutable and one is not, bytes
should also have fromord
.
--
Ethan
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 467: last round (?)
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 467: last round (?)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]