[Python-Dev] PEP 467: last round (?) (original) (raw)
Martin Panter vadmium+py at gmail.com
Sat Sep 3 07:35:41 EDT 2016
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 467: last round (?)
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 467: last round (?)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Le samedi 3 septembre 2016, Random832 <random832 at fastmail.com> a écrit :
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016, at 19:44, Ethan Furman wrote: > The problem with only having
bchr
is that it doesn't help with >bytearray
;What is the use case for bytearray.fromord? Even in the rare case someone needs it, why not bytearray(bchr(...))?
On 3 September 2016 at 08:47, Victor Stinner <victor.stinner at gmail.com> wrote:
Yes, this was my point: I don't think that we need a bytearray method to create a mutable string from a single byte.
I agree with the above. Having an easy way to turn an int into a bytes object is good. But I think the built-in bchr() function on its own is enough. Just like we have bytes object literals, but the closest we have for a bytearray literal is bytearray(b". . .").
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 467: last round (?)
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 467: last round (?)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]