[Python-Dev] PEP520 and absence of definition_order (original) (raw)

Eric Snow ericsnowcurrently at gmail.com
Sat Sep 10 14:52:51 EDT 2016

On Sep 10, 2016 11:00, "Nick Coghlan" <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:

On 11 September 2016 at 03:08, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: > So I'm happy to continue thinking about this, but I expect this is not > such a big deal as you fear. Anyway, let's see if someone comes up > with a more convincing argument by beta 2! , Nick. P.S. I'd actually love it if we could skip definitionorder - there really is a whole lot of runtime clutter on class objects, and we're adding annotations as well. Unfortunately, I also think we made the right call the first time around in thinking it would still be necessary even if class namespaces became order preserving :) -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia

Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev at python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/ericsnowcurrently%40gmail.com

-eric (phone) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20160910/d99b55d5/attachment.html>

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list