[Python-Dev] What's the status of PEP 505: None-aware operators? (original) (raw)
Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
Sat Dec 2 21:39:02 EST 2017
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] What's the status of PEP 505: None-aware operators?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] What's the status of PEP 505: None-aware operators?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 2 December 2017 at 12:01, Steven D'Aprano <steve at pearwood.info> wrote:
The PEP only mentions function?() as a rejected idea, do I don't know why we're even talking about it. The PEP is deferred, with considerable opposition and luke-warm support, even the PEP author has said he's not going to push for it, and we're arguing about a pedantic point related to a part of the PEP which is rejected...
Nevertheless, I've fixed the rationale for that decision so folks don't get hung up on the mistake in the previously noted rationale: https://github.com/python/peps/commit/966dd426787e6de8ec6218955cec57f65086c5b4
Cheers, Nick.
-- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] What's the status of PEP 505: None-aware operators?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] What's the status of PEP 505: None-aware operators?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]