[Python-Dev] Guarantee ordered dict literals in v3.7? (original) (raw)
Raymond Hettinger raymond.hettinger at gmail.com
Fri Dec 15 01:31:15 EST 2017
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Guarantee ordered dict literals in v3.7?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Guarantee ordered dict literals in v3.7?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I support having regular dicts maintain insertion order but am opposed to Inada changing the implementation of collections.OrderedDict We can have the first without having the second.
It seems like the two quoted paragraphs are in vociferous agreement.
The referenced tracker entry proposes, "Issue31265: Remove doubly-linked list from C OrderedDict". I don't think that should go forward regardless of whether regular dict order is guaranteed.
Inada presented a compound proposition: either guarantee regular dict order or let him rip out the core design of OrderedDicts against my wishes.
Raymond
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Guarantee ordered dict literals in v3.7?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Guarantee ordered dict literals in v3.7?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]