[Python-Dev] Decision of having a deprecation period or not for changing csv.DictReader returning type. (original) (raw)
Brett Cannon brett at python.org
Mon Dec 18 16:55:35 EST 2017
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Decision of having a deprecation period or not for changing csv.DictReader returning type.
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Broken svn lookup?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, 18 Dec 2017 at 07:30 Steve Holden <steve at holdenweb.com> wrote:
I submitted the 3.6 patch that Raymond committed. The purpose of the change was to allow access to the ordering of the columns.
It doesn't use any of the OrderedDict-only methods, and I'd be very surprised if a reversion to using dict in 3.7 would cause any tests to fail.
But as Guido pointed out, the expected interface of what gets returned would be broken. I say just leave it as-is.
-Brett
regards Steve Steve Holden On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 6:30 AM, 尚辉 <shangdahao at gmail.com> wrote:
Since regular dicts are ordered in 3.7, it might be cleaner to returning regular dict instead of OrderedDict?
Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev at python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/steve%40holdenweb.com
Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev at python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/brett%40python.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20171218/616c34d3/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Decision of having a deprecation period or not for changing csv.DictReader returning type.
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Broken svn lookup?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]