[Python-Dev] Impact of Namedtuple on startup time (original) (raw)
MRAB python at mrabarnett.plus.com
Mon Jul 17 16:57:24 EDT 2017
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Impact of Namedtuple on startup time
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Impact of Namedtuple on startup time
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 2017-07-17 21:46, MRAB wrote:
On 2017-07-17 21:31, Giampaolo Rodola' wrote:
I completely agree. I love namedtuples but I've never been too happy about the additional overhead vs. plain tuples (both for creation and attribute access times), to the point that I explicitly avoid to use them in certain circumstances (e.g. a busy loop) and only for public end-user APIs returning multiple values.
To be entirely honest, I'm not even sure why they need to be forcefully declared upfront in the first place, instead of just having a first-class function (builtin?) written in C: >>> ntuple(x=1, y=0) (x=1, y=0) ...or even a literal as in: >>> (x=1, y=0) (x=1, y=0) [snip] I know it's a bit early to bikeshed, but shouldn't that be: >>> (x: 1, y: 0) (x: 1, y: 0) instead if it's a display/literal? Actually, come to think of it, a dict's keys would be quoted, so there would be a slight inconsistency there...
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Impact of Namedtuple on startup time
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Impact of Namedtuple on startup time
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]