[Python-Dev] Impact of Namedtuple on startup time (original) (raw)

Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
Tue Jul 18 08:13:01 EDT 2017


On 18 July 2017 at 05:42, Raymond Hettinger <raymond.hettinger at gmail.com> wrote:

One minor grumble: I think we need to give careful cost/benefit considerations to optimizations that complicate the implementation. Over the last several years, the source for Python has grown increasingly complicated. Fewer people understand it now. It is much harder to newcomers to on-ramp. The old-timers (myself included) find that their knowledge is out of date. And complexity leads to bugs (the C optimization of random number seeding caused a major bug in the 3.6.0 release; the C optimization of the lrucache resulted in multiple releases having a hard to find threading bugs, etc.). It is becoming increasingly difficult to look at code and tell whether it is correct (I still don't fully understand the implications of the recursive constant folding in the peephole optimizer for example). In the case of this named tuple proposal, the complexity is manageable, but the overall trend isn't good and I get the feeling the aggressive optimization is causing us to forget key par ts of the zen-of-python.

As another example of this: while trading the global import lock for per-module locks eliminated most of the old import deadlocks, it turns out that it also left us with some fairly messy race conditions and more fragile code (I still count that particular case as a win overall, but it definitely raises the barrier to entry for maintaining that code).

Unfortunately, these are frequently cases where the benefits are immediately visible (e.g. faster benchmark results, removing longstanding limitations on user code), but the downsides can literally take years to make themselves felt (e.g. higher defect rates in the interpreter, subtle bugs in previously correct user code that are eventually traced back to interpreter changes).

Cheers, Nick.

-- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia



More information about the Python-Dev mailing list