[Python-Dev] Design Philosophy: Performance vs Robustness/Maintainability (original) (raw)
Victor Stinner victor.stinner at gmail.com
Tue Jul 18 12:12:09 EDT 2017
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Design Philosophy: Performance vs Robustness/Maintainability
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Design Philosophy: Performance vs Robustness/Maintainability
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[Python-Dev] Design Philosophy: Performance vs Robustness/Maintainability
2017-07-18 18:08 GMT+02:00 Ethan Furman <ethan at stoneleaf.us>:
Nick Coughlan: -------------
As another example of this: while trading the global import lock for per-module locks eliminated most of the old import deadlocks, (...)
Minor remark: the email subject is inaccurate, this change is not related to performance. I would more say that it's about correctness.
Python 3 doesn't hung on deadlock in "legit" import anymore ;-)
Victor
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Design Philosophy: Performance vs Robustness/Maintainability
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Design Philosophy: Performance vs Robustness/Maintainability
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]