[Python-Dev] RFC: Backport ssl.MemoryBIO and ssl.SSLObject to Python 2.7 (original) (raw)
Antoine Pitrou solipsis at pitrou.net
Thu Jun 1 11:56:57 EDT 2017
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] RFC: Backport ssl.MemoryBIO and ssl.SSLObject to Python 2.7
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] RFC: Backport ssl.MemoryBIO and ssl.SSLObject to Python 2.7
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 1 Jun 2017 15:09:41 +0100 Cory Benfield <cory at lukasa.co.uk> wrote:
As to the plans to move Requests to a more event loop-y model, I think that it does stand in the way of this, but only insomuch as, again, we want our event loopy model to be as bug-free as possible. But I can concede that rewording on that point would be valuable. However, it’s my understanding that even if I did that rewording, you’d still be against it. Is that correct?
Yes. It's just that it would more fairly inform the people reading it.
Regards
Antoine.
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] RFC: Backport ssl.MemoryBIO and ssl.SSLObject to Python 2.7
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] RFC: Backport ssl.MemoryBIO and ssl.SSLObject to Python 2.7
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]