[Python-Dev] PEP 484 update proposal: annotating decorated declarations (original) (raw)
Naomi Seyfer naomi at seyfer.org
Fri Jun 2 11:34:43 EDT 2017
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Aligning the packaging.python.org theme with the rest of the docs
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 484 update proposal: annotating decorated declarations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Yep, interested in implementing it! I will put implementation time on my schedule and tell y'all when it is, for holding myself accountable -- it turns out I never do anything not on my schedule.
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 3:17 PM, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 6:16 AM, Ivan Levkivskyi <levkivskyi at gmail.com> wrote:
On 30 May 2017 at 23:02, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
All in all I'm still leaning towards Naomi's original proposal -- it looks simpler to implement as well.
OK, I think having a bit of verbosity is absolutely fine if we win simplicity of implementation (for both static and runtime purposes). Then I propose to do it this way. We can always add Jukka's way as an alternative notation later. I'd like to hear from Jukka before I merge the PR for PEP-484. In the meantime, Naomi, are you interested in trying to implement this? -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20170602/4de768eb/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Aligning the packaging.python.org theme with the rest of the docs
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 484 update proposal: annotating decorated declarations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]