[Python-Dev] New workflow change: Welcome to blurb (original) (raw)
Terry Reedy tjreedy at udel.edu
Sun Jun 25 12:30:58 EDT 2017
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] New workflow change: Welcome to blurb
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] [python-committers] New workflow change: Welcome to blurb
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 6/25/2017 12:16 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 6/25/2017 8:06 AM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
24.06.17 18:57, Larry Hastings пише:
On 06/24/2017 01:53 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Would you like to make it 3.5-compatible? 3.6 is quite young and not all systems have it (e.g. Ubuntu 16.04, which many people use, has 3.5).
Well, tbh I think that's a bit silly. First of all, it shouldn't be installed in your system-wide python3 interpreter. Second, I assumed core devs were compiling their own Python interpreters locally in their account--in no small part so they can install any packages they want. And finally, you're asking me to give up f-strings. If someone else wants to send me a PR getting it to work on 3.5, I'd look at it. I'm guessing it's really just f-strings but I can't say for sure what else is a 3.6 dependency. https://github.com/python/core-workflow/pull/143 The diff amounts to regressing all f-strings back to %-strings. If the patch is applied, an issue should be opened to revert it sometime in the future, such as when 3.7 is released. But I really think we should be able to use currently released python to write tools to develop future releases. My alternative proposal: modify the tooling so that one can install blurb, cherrypicker, and anything else into local cloned repositories without blocking proper use of git. As near as I can tell, we just need to .gitignore Scripts/ and Lib/site-packages/, which are empty in the master repository. Am I missing something?
The repository does not have an empty Scripts/ (and maybe this is Windows specific). It does have Lib/site-packages.
F:\dev\3x>python -m ensurepip Running Debug|Win32 interpreter... Collecting setuptools Collecting pip Installing collected packages: setuptools, pip Successfully installed pip-9.0.1 setuptools-28.8.0
F:\dev\3x>git status On branch pr2377 Untracked files: (use "git add ..." to include in what will be committed) Lib/site-packages/easyinstall.py Lib/site-packages/pip-9.0.1.dist-info/ Lib/site-packages/pip/ Lib/site-packages/pkgresources/ Lib/site-packages/setuptools-28.8.0.dist-info/ Lib/site-packages/setuptools/ Scripts/ nothing added to commit but untracked files present (use "git add" to track) F:\dev\3x>python -m pip install blurb Running Debug|Win32 interpreter... Collecting blurb Downloading blurb-1.0.0.post1-py3-none-any.whl (56kB) 100% |████████████████████████████████| 61kB 596kB/s Installing collected packages: blurb Successfully installed blurb-1.0.0.post1
Removing added files is different from reverting changes to existing files. To clean up, after running 'git clean -d -n', I ran F:\dev\3x>git clean -d -f Removing Lib/site-packages/blurb-1.0.0.post1.dist-info/ Removing Lib/site-packages/blurb.py Removing Lib/site-packages/easy_install.py Removing Lib/site-packages/pip-9.0.1.dist-info/ Removing Lib/site-packages/pip/ Removing Lib/site-packages/pkg_resources/ Removing Lib/site-packages/setuptools-28.8.0.dist-info/ Removing Lib/site-packages/setuptools/ Removing Misc/NEWS.d/next/IDLE/2017-06-25-12-00-03.bpo-12345.2Oj8ot.rst Removing Scripts/
-- Terry Jan Reedy
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] New workflow change: Welcome to blurb
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] [python-committers] New workflow change: Welcome to blurb
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]