[Python-Dev] PEP 484 update proposal: annotating decorated declarations (original) (raw)
Guido van Rossum guido at python.org
Wed May 31 18:17:42 EDT 2017
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 484 update proposal: annotating decorated declarations
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 484 proposal: don't default to Optional if argument default is None
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 6:16 AM, Ivan Levkivskyi <levkivskyi at gmail.com> wrote:
On 30 May 2017 at 23:02, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
All in all I'm still leaning towards Naomi's original proposal -- it looks simpler to implement as well.
OK, I think having a bit of verbosity is absolutely fine if we win simplicity of implementation (for both static and runtime purposes).
Then I propose to do it this way. We can always add Jukka's way as an alternative notation later. I'd like to hear from Jukka before I merge the PR for PEP-484.
In the meantime, Naomi, are you interested in trying to implement this?
-- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20170531/c5104b35/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 484 update proposal: annotating decorated declarations
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 484 proposal: don't default to Optional if argument default is None
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]