[Python-Dev] What's the status of PEP 505: None-aware operators? (original) (raw)
Raymond Hettinger raymond.hettinger at gmail.com
Tue Nov 28 15:31:06 EST 2017
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] What's the status of PEP 505: None-aware operators?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] What's the status of PEP 505: None-aware operators?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I also cc python-dev to see if anybody here is strongly in favor or against this inclusion.
Put me down for a strong -1. The proposal would occasionally save a few keystokes but comes at the expense of giving Python a more Perlish look and a more arcane feel.
One of the things I like about Python is that I can walk non-programmers through the code and explain what it does. The examples in PEP 505 look like a step in the wrong direction. They don't "look like Python" and make me feel like I have to decrypt the code to figure-out what it does.
timeout ?? local_timeout ?? global_timeout
'foo' in (None ?? ['foo', 'bar'])
requested_quantity ?? default_quantity * price
name?.strip()[4:].upper()
user?.first_name.upper()Raymond
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] What's the status of PEP 505: None-aware operators?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] What's the status of PEP 505: None-aware operators?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]