[Python-Dev] Intention to accept PEP 552 soon (deterministic pyc files) (original) (raw)
Koos Zevenhoven k7hoven at gmail.com
Sun Oct 1 16:52:31 EDT 2017
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Intention to accept PEP 552 soon (deterministic pyc files)
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Intention to accept PEP 552 soon (deterministic pyc files)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Oct 1, 2017 19:26, "Guido van Rossum" <guido at python.org> wrote:
Your PEP is currently incomplete. If you don't finish it, it is not even a contender. But TBH it's not my favorite anyway, so you could also just withdraw it.
I can withdraw it if you ask me to, but I don't want to withdraw it without any reason. I haven't changed my mind about the big picture. OTOH, PEP 521 is elegant and could be used to implement PEP 555, but 521 is almost certainly less performant and has some problems regarding context manager wrappers that use composition instead of inheritance.
-- Koos
On Oct 1, 2017 9:13 AM, "Koos Zevenhoven" <k7hoven at gmail.com> wrote:
On Sep 29, 2017 18:21, "Guido van Rossum" <guido at python.org> wrote:
PS. PEP 550 is still unaccepted, awaiting a new revision from Yury and Elvis. This is getting really off-topic, but I do have updates to add to PEP 555 if there is interest in that. IMO, 555 is better and most likely faster than 550, but on the other hand, the issues with PEP 550 are most likely not going to be a problem for me personally. -- Koos -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20171001/b07002a6/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Intention to accept PEP 552 soon (deterministic pyc files)
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Intention to accept PEP 552 soon (deterministic pyc files)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]