[Python-Dev] PEP 557: Data Classes (original) (raw)
Guido van Rossum gvanrossum at gmail.com
Thu Sep 14 16:52:54 EDT 2017
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 557: Data Classes
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 557: Data Classes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Let's all please take a time out from the naming discussion.
On Sep 14, 2017 11:15 AM, "Stefan Krah" <stefan at bytereef.org> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:06:15AM -0700, Mike Miller wrote: > On 2017-09-14 10:45, Stefan Krah wrote: > >I'd expect something like a C struct or an ML record. > > Struct is taken, and your second example is record.
If the name were collections.record, I'd expect collections.record to be something like a C struct or an ML record. I'm NOT proposing "record".
> > from dataclass import dataclass > > > >This is more intuitive, since the PEP example also has attached methods > >like totalcost(). I don't think this is really common for records. > > Every class can be extended, does that mean they can't be given appropriate names? A class is not a record. This brief conversation already convinced me that "record" is a bad name for the proposed construct.
Stefan Krah
Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev at python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/ guido%40python.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20170914/806fc54d/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 557: Data Classes
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 557: Data Classes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]