[Python-Dev] Are undocumented functions part of the stable ABI? (original) (raw)
Guido van Rossum guido at python.org
Wed Apr 4 11:56:30 EDT 2018
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Are undocumented functions part of the stable ABI?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Are undocumented functions part of the stable ABI?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
It would be helpful if you explained the context of your request. E.g. did you have some code that broke due to a change in one of these functions, or are you contemplating a change to one of them? And specifics of what broke or what you're contemplating.
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 1:58 AM, Jeroen Demeyer <J.Demeyer at ugent.be> wrote:
Hello,
I have a question about PEP 384: can undocumented functions ever be considered as part of the stable ABI? With undocumented, I mean not appearing in the "Python/C API Reference Manual". Whatever the answer to this question is, it would be good to make it explicit in PEP 384. I am in particular asking about functions starting with PyCFunction appearing in Include/methodobject.h
Thanks, Jeroen.
Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev at python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido% 40python.org
-- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20180404/59822132/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Are undocumented functions part of the stable ABI?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Are undocumented functions part of the stable ABI?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]