[Python-Dev] GH-NNNN vs #NNNN in merge commit (original) (raw)

Brett Cannon brett at python.org
Thu Jan 25 13:53:17 EST 2018

On Thu, 25 Jan 2018 at 10:51 Berker Peksağ <berker.peksag at gmail.com> wrote:

On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 9:38 PM, Mariatta Wijaya <mariatta.wijaya at gmail.com> wrote: >> That would be best solution (I think it would solve >> https://github.com/python/miss-islington/issues/16 too) but it's more >> complicated than the extension idea :) I have some time work on it if >> you'd like to implement the mergebot idea. > > > +1 for the mergebot! :) > > New bot or miss-islington's new job? > > Still +1 either way, as long as other core devs are fine with it too :)

I'm not familiar with miss-islington's codebase. Can we reuse some parts of miss-islington in the new bot? If we can, let's implement it in miss-islington (perhaps as a new mode?)

I would assume it would just go into miss-islington, but before we get ahead of ourselves and design this we need to get consensus that people like the overall idea of using a bot to do a main commits as well. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20180125/8defc8c7/attachment.html>

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list