[Python-Dev] Benchmarks why we need PEP 576/579/580 (original) (raw)
Jeroen Demeyer J.Demeyer at UGent.be
Sun Jul 22 12:30:55 EDT 2018
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Benchmarks why we need PEP 576/579/580
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Benchmarks why we need PEP 576/579/580
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 2018-07-22 18:14, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Sorry I don't have better news.
I don't consider that particularly bad news (but not good news either). I feel like the status on PEP 580 isn't anywhere near accepted anyway.
I just hope that Python development won't stall completely. Even if no formal action can be taken on this PEP (or any other), I hope that there will still be informal discussion.
Jeroen.
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Benchmarks why we need PEP 576/579/580
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Benchmarks why we need PEP 576/579/580
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]