[Python-Dev] PEP 575 (Unifying function/method classes) update (original) (raw)
INADA Naoki songofacandy at gmail.com
Mon Jun 18 02:25:36 EDT 2018
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 575 (Unifying function/method classes) update
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 575 (Unifying function/method classes) update
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I didn't meant comparing tp_fastcall and your PEP.
I just meant we need to compare complexity and benefit (performance), and we need reference implementation for comparing.
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 3:03 PM Jeroen Demeyer <J.Demeyer at ugent.be> wrote:
On 2018-06-18 03:34, INADA Naoki wrote: > Victor had tried to add
tpfastcall
slot, but he suspended his effort > because > it's benefit is not enough for it's complexity. > https://bugs.python.org/issue29259I has a quick look at that patch and it's really orthogonal to what I'm proposing. I'm proposing to use the slot instead of existing fastcall optimizations. Victor's patch was about adding fastcall support to classes that didn't support it before.
Jeroen.
Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev at python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/songofacandy%40gmail.com
-- INADA Naoki <songofacandy at gmail.com> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20180618/e0133d1f/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 575 (Unifying function/method classes) update
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 575 (Unifying function/method classes) update
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]