[Python-Dev] PEP 579 and PEP 580: refactoring C functions and methods (original) (raw)
Jeroen Demeyer J.Demeyer at UGent.be
Wed Jun 20 10:49:38 EDT 2018
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 579 and PEP 580: refactoring C functions and methods
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 579 and PEP 580: refactoring C functions and methods
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 2018-06-20 16:42, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
I'm wondering what amount of code and debugging is needed for, say, Cython or Numba to implement that protocol as a caller, without going through the C API's indirections (for performance).
The goal is to have a really fast C API without a lot of indirections. If Cython or Numba can implement the protocol faster than CPython, we should just change the CPython implementation to be equally fast.
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 579 and PEP 580: refactoring C functions and methods
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 579 and PEP 580: refactoring C functions and methods
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]