[Python-Dev] Can we make METH_FASTCALL public, from Python 3.7? (ref: PEP 579 (original) (raw)
Antoine Pitrou solipsis at pitrou.net
Wed Jun 20 12:16:42 EDT 2018
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Can we make METH_FASTCALL public, from Python 3.7? (ref: PEP 579
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Can we make METH_FASTCALL public, from Python 3.7? (ref: PEP 579
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 20 Jun 2018 18:09:00 +0200 Victor Stinner <vstinner at redhat.com> wrote:
> If we can't at Python 3.7, I think we should do it at 3.8. What's the rationale to make it public in 3.7? Can't it wait for 3.8? The new PEPs target 3.8 anyway, no? IMHO it's too late for 3.7.
Agreed with Victor. Also Jeroen's work might lead us to change the protocol for better flexibility or performance. Let's not make it a public API too early.
Regards
Antoine.
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Can we make METH_FASTCALL public, from Python 3.7? (ref: PEP 579
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Can we make METH_FASTCALL public, from Python 3.7? (ref: PEP 579
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]