[Python-Dev] About [].append == [].append (original) (raw)
Serhiy Storchaka storchaka at gmail.com
Thu Jun 21 15:53:02 EDT 2018
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] About [].append == [].append
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] About [].append == [].append
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
21.06.18 14:25, Jeroen Demeyer пише:
Currently, we have:
>>> [].append == [].append False However, with a Python class: >>> class List(list): .... def append(self, x): super().append(x) >>> List().append == List().append True
I think this is a bug. These bound methods can't be equal because they have different side effect.
The use case for using "is" for self is described by the OP of issue1617161. I don't know use cases for using "==".
There is a related problem of hashing. Currently bound methods are not hashable if self is not hashable. This makes impossible using them as dict keys.
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] About [].append == [].append
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] About [].append == [].append
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]