[Python-Dev] About [].append == [].append (original) (raw)
Guido van Rossum guido at python.org
Fri Jun 22 14:44:07 EDT 2018
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] About [].append == [].append
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] About [].append == [].append
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 9:43 AM Steven D'Aprano <steve at pearwood.info> wrote:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 08:13:44AM -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Honestly it looks to me like the status quo is perfect. Does this example work for you? py> (17.1).hex == (17.1).hex True But: py> a = 17.1 py> b = 17.1 py> a.hex == b.hex False I know why it happens -- at the REPL, the interpreter uses the same object for both 17.1 instances when they're part of the same statement, but not when they're on separate lines. I just don't know whether this is desirable or not.
But there's nothing new about that example. It's just the same as the issue
that sometimes 1 is 1
and sometimes it isn't.
-- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20180622/341f51c8/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] About [].append == [].append
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] About [].append == [].append
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]