[Python-Dev] Informal educator feedback on PEP 572 (was Re: 2018 Python Language Summit coverage, last part) (original) (raw)
Chris Angelico rosuav at gmail.com
Wed Jun 27 03:52:16 EDT 2018
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Informal educator feedback on PEP 572 (was Re: 2018 Python Language Summit coverage, last part)
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Informal educator feedback on PEP 572 (was Re: 2018 Python Language Summit coverage, last part)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 5:30 PM, Paul Moore <p.f.moore at gmail.com> wrote:
But test() returns [1, 2]. So does that say (as you claim above) that "the comprehension ran in the enclosing scope"? Doesn't it just say that the outermost iterable runs in the enclosing scope?
Yes - because the outermost iterable runs in the enclosing scope. But suppose you worded it like this:
def test(): a = 1 b = 2 vars = {key: locals()[key] for key in locals()} return vars
What would your intuition say? Should this be equivalent to dict(locals()) ?
ChrisA
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Informal educator feedback on PEP 572 (was Re: 2018 Python Language Summit coverage, last part)
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Informal educator feedback on PEP 572 (was Re: 2018 Python Language Summit coverage, last part)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]