[Python-Dev] Informal educator feedback on PEP 572 (was Re: 2018 Python Language Summit coverage, last part) (original) (raw)
Baptiste Carvello devel at baptiste-carvello.net
Thu Jun 28 08:05:26 EDT 2018
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Informal educator feedback on PEP 572 (was Re: 2018 Python Language Summit coverage, last part)
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Informal educator feedback on PEP 572 (was Re: 2018 Python Language Summit coverage, last part)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Le 28/06/2018 à 01:31, Greg Ewing a écrit :
Well, I remain profoundly unconvinced that writing comprehensions with side effects is ever a good idea, and Tim's examples did nothing to change that.
Comprehensions with side effects feel scary indeed. But I could see myself using some variant of the "cumsum" example (for scientific work at the command prompt):
x=0; [x:=x+i for i in range(5)]
Here the side effects are irrelevant, the "x" variable won't be reused. But it needs to be initialized at the start of the comprehension.
I would happily get rid of the side-effects, but then what would be a non-cryptic alternative to the above example?
Baptiste
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Informal educator feedback on PEP 572 (was Re: 2018 Python Language Summit coverage, last part)
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Informal educator feedback on PEP 572 (was Re: 2018 Python Language Summit coverage, last part)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]