[Python-Dev] Symmetry arguments for API expansion (original) (raw)

Antoine Pitrou solipsis at pitrou.net
Mon Mar 12 14:10:27 EDT 2018

On Mon, 12 Mar 2018 09:49:27 -0700 Raymond Hettinger <raymond.hettinger at gmail.com> wrote:

Starting point: Do we need this? * We already have a simple, traditional, portable, and readable way to make the test: int(x) == x

It doesn't look that obvious to me. As a reviewer I would request to add a comment explaining the test.

* Aside from the OP, this behavior has never been requested in Python's 27 year history.

That's possible. One thing I often see is suboptimal compatibility with third-party integer types such as Numpy ints, but that's a slightly different request (as it usually doesn't imply accepting Numpy floats that exactly represent integrals).

Does it cost us anything? * Yes, adding a method to the numeric tower makes it a requirement for every class that ever has or ever will register or inherit from the tower ABCs.

Well, the big question is whether the notion of numeric tower is useful in Python at all. If it's useful then there's a point to expand its usability with such a feature. Personally I don't care much :-)

As a result, we ended-up with an awkward and error-prone API that requires double parenthesis for the valid use case: url.endswith(('.html', '.css')).

It doesn't look that awkward to me.

Regards

Antoine.

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list