[Python-Dev] Subtle difference between f-strings and str.format() (original) (raw)
Steven D'Aprano steve at pearwood.info
Thu Mar 29 19:16:47 EDT 2018
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Subtle difference between f-strings and str.format()
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Subtle difference between f-strings and str.format()
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 06:27:19PM +0300, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
2. Change the semantic of f-strings. Make it closer to the semantic of str.format(): evaluate all subexpressions first than format them. This can be implemented in two ways:
2a) Add additional instructions for stack manipulations. This will slow down f-strings. 2b) Introduce a new complex opcode that will replace FORMATVALUE and BUILDSTRING. This will speed up f-strings.
If the aim here is to be an optimization, then I vote strongly for 2b.
That gives you faster f-strings that have the same order-of-evaluation of normal method calls, so that when you optimize str.format into an f-string, not only is the behaviour identical, but they will be even faster than with option 3.
Python's execution model implies that
obj.method(expression_a, expression_b)
should fully evaluate both expressions before they are passed to the method. Making str.format a magical special case that violates that rule should be a last resort.
In this case, we can have our cake and eat it too: both the str.format to f-string optimization and keeping the normal evaluation rules. And as a bonus, we make f-strings even faster.
I say "we", but of course it is Serhiy doing the work, thank you.
Is there a down-side to 2b? It sounds like something you might end up doing at a later date regardless of what you do now.
-- Steve
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Subtle difference between f-strings and str.format()
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Subtle difference between f-strings and str.format()
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]